TO BECOME DATABRICKS CERTIFIED, RELY ON UPDATED DATABRICKS-GENERATIVE-AI-ENGINEER-ASSOCIATE DUMPS

To Become Databricks Certified, Rely on Updated Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Dumps

To Become Databricks Certified, Rely on Updated Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Dumps

Blog Article

Tags: Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Reliable Test Tutorial, Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Vce Format, Exam Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Simulator Fee, Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Free Practice, Relevant Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Questions

The content and design of our Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate learning quiz are all perfect and scientific, and you will know it when you use this. Of course, we don't need you to spend a lot of time on our Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate exam questions. As long as you make full use of your own piecemeal time after 20 to 30 hours of study, you can go to the exam. The users of ourDatabricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Study Materials have been satisfied with their results. I believe you are the next person to pass the exam!

Databricks Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Exam Syllabus Topics:

TopicDetails
Topic 1
  • Evaluation and Monitoring: This topic is all about selecting an LLM choice and key metrics. Moreover, Generative AI Engineers learn about evaluating model performance. Lastly, the topic includes sub-topics about inference logging and usage of Databricks features.
Topic 2
  • Assembling and Deploying Applications: In this topic, Generative AI Engineers get knowledge about coding a chain using a pyfunc mode, coding a simple chain using langchain, and coding a simple chain according to requirements. Additionally, the topic focuses on basic elements needed to create a RAG application. Lastly, the topic addresses sub-topics about registering the model to Unity Catalog using MLflow.
Topic 3
  • Governance: Generative AI Engineers who take the exam get knowledge about masking techniques, guardrail techniques, and legal
  • licensing requirements in this topic.
Topic 4
  • Design Applications: The topic focuses on designing a prompt that elicits a specifically formatted response. It also focuses on selecting model tasks to accomplish a given business requirement. Lastly, the topic covers chain components for a desired model input and output.

>> Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Reliable Test Tutorial <<

Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Vce Format & Exam Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Simulator Fee

To increase people’s knowledge and understanding of this Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate exam, so as to improve and direct your practice, our experts made the Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate study questions diligently and assiduously all these years. Our Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate practice materials are successful measures and methods to adopt. They also make new supplementary Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate learning materials and add prediction of market trend happened in this exam.

Databricks Certified Generative AI Engineer Associate Sample Questions (Q46-Q51):

NEW QUESTION # 46
When developing an LLM application, it's crucial to ensure that the data used for training the model complies with licensing requirements to avoid legal risks.
Which action is NOT appropriate to avoid legal risks?

  • A. Reach out to the data curators directly before you have started using the trained model to let them know.
  • B. Use any available data you personally created which is completely original and you can decide what license to use.
  • C. Only use data explicitly labeled with an open license and ensure the license terms are followed.
  • D. Reach out to the data curators directly after you have started using the trained model to let them know.

Answer: D

Explanation:
* Problem Context: When using data to train a model, it's essential to ensure compliance with licensing to avoid legal risks. Legal issues can arise from using data without permission, especially when it comes from third-party sources.
* Explanation of Options:
* Option A: Reaching out to data curatorsbeforeusing the data is an appropriate action. This allows you to ensure you have permission or understand the licensing terms before starting to use the data in your model.
* Option B: Usingoriginal datathat you personally created is always a safe option. Since you have full ownership over the data, there are no legal risks, as you control the licensing.
* Option C: Using data that is explicitly labeled with an open license and adhering to the license terms is a correct and recommended approach. This ensures compliance with legal requirements.
* Option D: Reaching out to the data curatorsafteryou have already started using the trained model isnot appropriate. If you've already used the data without understanding its licensing terms, you may have already violated the terms of use, which could lead to legal complications. It's essential to clarify the licensing termsbeforeusing the data, not after.
Thus,Option Dis not appropriate because it could expose you to legal risks by using the data without first obtaining the proper licensing permissions.


NEW QUESTION # 47
A Generative AI Engineer developed an LLM application using the provisioned throughput Foundation Model API. Now that the application is ready to be deployed, they realize their volume of requests are not sufficiently high enough to create their own provisioned throughput endpoint. They want to choose a strategy that ensures the best cost-effectiveness for their application.
What strategy should the Generative AI Engineer use?

  • A. Change to a model with a fewer number of parameters in order to reduce hardware constraint issues
  • B. Throttle the incoming batch of requests manually to avoid rate limiting issues
  • C. Deploy the model using pay-per-token throughput as it comes with cost guarantees
  • D. Switch to using External Models instead

Answer: C

Explanation:
* Problem Context: The engineer needs a cost-effective deployment strategy for an LLM application with relatively low request volume.
* Explanation of Options:
* Option A: Switching to external models may not provide the required control or integration necessary for specific application needs.
* Option B: Using a pay-per-token model is cost-effective, especially for applications with variable or low request volumes, as it aligns costs directly with usage.
* Option C: Changing to a model with fewer parameters could reduce costs, but might also impact the performance and capabilities of the application.
* Option D: Manually throttling requests is a less efficient and potentially error-prone strategy for managing costs.
OptionBis ideal, offering flexibility and cost control, aligning expenses directly with the application's usage patterns.


NEW QUESTION # 48
A Generative AI Engineer is designing an LLM-powered live sports commentary platform. The platform provides real-time updates and LLM-generated analyses for any users who would like to have live summaries, rather than reading a series of potentially outdated news articles.
Which tool below will give the platform access to real-time data for generating game analyses based on the latest game scores?

  • A. AutoML
  • B. Foundation Model APIs
  • C. Feature Serving
  • D. DatabrickslQ

Answer: C

Explanation:
* Problem Context: The engineer is developing an LLM-powered live sports commentary platform that needs to provide real-time updates and analyses based on the latest game scores. The critical requirement here is the capability to access and integrate real-time data efficiently with the platform for immediate analysis and reporting.
* Explanation of Options:
* Option A: DatabricksIQ: While DatabricksIQ offers integration and data processing capabilities, it is more aligned with data analytics rather than real-time feature serving, which is crucial for immediate updates necessary in a live sports commentary context.
* Option B: Foundation Model APIs: These APIs facilitate interactions with pre-trained models and could be part of the solution, but on their own, they do not provide mechanisms to access real- time game scores.
* Option C: Feature Serving: This is the correct answer as feature serving specifically refers to the real-time provision of data (features) to models for prediction. This would be essential for an LLM that generates analyses based on live game data, ensuring that the commentary is current and based on the latest events in the sport.
* Option D: AutoML: This tool automates the process of applying machine learning models to real-world problems, but it does not directly provide real-time data access, which is a critical requirement for the platform.
Thus,Option C(Feature Serving) is the most suitable tool for the platform as it directly supports the real-time data needs of an LLM-powered sports commentary system, ensuring that the analyses and updates are based on the latest available information.


NEW QUESTION # 49
A team wants to serve a code generation model as an assistant for their software developers. It should support multiple programming languages. Quality is the primary objective.
Which of the Databricks Foundation Model APIs, or models available in the Marketplace, would be the best fit?

  • A. BGE-large
  • B. CodeLlama-34B
  • C. Llama2-70b
  • D. MPT-7b

Answer: B

Explanation:
For a code generation model that supports multiple programming languages and where quality is the primary objective,CodeLlama-34Bis the most suitable choice. Here's the reasoning:
* Specialization in Code Generation:CodeLlama-34B is specifically designed for code generation tasks.
This model has been trained with a focus on understanding and generating code, which makes it particularly adept at handling various programming languages and coding contexts.
* Capacity and Performance:The "34B" indicates a model size of 34 billion parameters, suggesting a high capacity for handling complex tasks and generating high-quality outputs. The large model size typically correlates with better understanding and generation capabilities in diverse scenarios.
* Suitability for Development Teams:Given that the model is optimized for code, it will be able to assist software developers more effectively than general-purpose models. It understands coding syntax, semantics, and the nuances of different programming languages.
* Why Other Options Are Less Suitable:
* A (Llama2-70b): While also a large model, it's more general-purpose and may not be as fine- tuned for code generation as CodeLlama.
* B (BGE-large): This model may not specifically focus on code generation.
* C (MPT-7b): Smaller than CodeLlama-34B and likely less capable in handling complex code generation tasks at high quality.
Therefore, for a high-quality, multi-language code generation application,CodeLlama-34B(option D) is the best fit.


NEW QUESTION # 50
A Generative AI Engineer has created a RAG application which can help employees retrieve answers from an internal knowledge base, such as Confluence pages or Google Drive. The prototype application is now working with some positive feedback from internal company testers. Now the Generative Al Engineer wants to formally evaluate the system's performance and understand where to focus their efforts to further improve the system.
How should the Generative AI Engineer evaluate the system?

  • A. Use cosine similarity score to comprehensively evaluate the quality of the final generated answers.
  • B. Benchmark multiple LLMs with the same data and pick the best LLM for the job.
  • C. Curate a dataset that can test the retrieval and generation components of the system separately. Use MLflow's built in evaluation metrics to perform the evaluation on the retrieval and generation components.
  • D. Use an LLM-as-a-judge to evaluate the quality of the final answers generated.

Answer: C

Explanation:
* Problem Context: After receiving positive feedback for the RAG application prototype, the next step is to formally evaluate the system to pinpoint areas for improvement.
* Explanation of Options:
* Option A: While cosine similarity scores are useful, they primarily measure similarity rather than the overall performance of an RAG system.
* Option B: This option provides a systematic approach to evaluation by testing both retrieval and generation components separately. This allows for targeted improvements and a clear understanding of each component's performance, using MLflow's metrics for a structured and standardized assessment.
* Option C: Benchmarking multiple LLMs does not focus on evaluating the existing system's components but rather on comparing different models.
* Option D: Using an LLM as a judge is subjective and less reliable for systematic performance evaluation.
OptionBis the most comprehensive and structured approach, facilitating precise evaluations and improvements on specific components of the RAG system.


NEW QUESTION # 51
......

VCEEngine is a very wonderful and effective platform to give chances to our worthy clients who want to achieve their expected scores and gain their Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate certifications. With our professional experts' tireless efforts, ourDatabricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate exam torrent is equipped with a simulated examination system with timing function, allowing you to examine your learning results at any time, keep checking for defects, and improve your strength. Whether you are a student or an office worker, you can be satisfied here, and you will never regret if you choose our Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Exam Torrent.

Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Vce Format: https://www.vceengine.com/Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate-vce-test-engine.html

Report this page